I like the ETH vs BTC debate for those that don't intend to use it.
I am also bullish on ETH vs BTC over the short and medium term. But ill play devils advocate: A big part of why Bitcoin "works" is that it doesn't have to do much. It just needs to retain its value, much like gold, but better: Unlike gold, it has lower cost to carry, can't be counter fitted, known supply is precise, and is much more liquid than the physical asset.
What about ETH? What are the long term tokenomics of ETH? Its inflative so thats one aspect of it. But what if ETH 2.0, or 3.0 necessitates reworking of tokenomics? Thats a big part of the uncertainty.
I like the ETH vs BTC debate for those that don't intend to use it.
I am also bullish on ETH vs BTC over the short and medium term. But ill play devils advocate: A big part of why Bitcoin "works" is that it doesn't have to do much. It just needs to retain its value, much like gold, but better: Unlike gold, it has lower cost to carry, can't be counter fitted, known supply is precise, and is much more liquid than the physical asset.
What about ETH? What are the long term tokenomics of ETH? Its inflative so thats one aspect of it. But what if ETH 2.0, or 3.0 necessitates reworking of tokenomics? Thats a big part of the uncertainty.